Myths and Facts About Gun Violence in America
The Joyce Foundation and our grantees believe that the toll that gun violence takes on our communities is preventable.
As families across the country – in Newtown, Conn., Tucson, Ariz., Aurora, Colo., and countless other towns -- grieve the loss of a loved one who fell victim to gun violence, the Joyce Foundation and our grantees remain committed to keeping our communities safe and free of gun violence. The nation mourns collectively when public mass shootings make headlines, but every day firearms end the life of innocent Americans whose death goes unmentioned.
There are several myths circulating in the public dialogue about gun violence in America. As a foundation committed to research-based grant-making, the Joyce Foundation and our grantees are dedicated to presenting the facts about the threat of gun violence to public safety and public health:
Myth: There is decreasing public support for policy solutions to curb gun violence.
Fact: The majority of Americans support common-sense measures to prevent gun violence.
For example, 92% of Americans support a measure requiring background checks on all potential gun buyers, while 63% of Americans support a measure banning military-style assault weapons. In fact, even 74% of NRA members and 87% of non-NRA gun owners support requiring criminal background checks of anyone purchasing a gun. While public opinion polling by Gallup has shown decreasing support for "stricter gun laws," other polls show that Americans overwhelmingly support specific gun policy solutions. Prominent pollsters have also questioned the Gallup poll.
Myth: All we need to do is enforce the laws already on the books.
Fact: Better gun enforcement and stronger gun laws are both needed to reduce gun violence.
Gun enforcement is critical, and law enforcement agrees. But even law enforcement believes that enforcement, without stronger laws, is not enough. The guns and ammunition used by the suspect in the Aurora shooting were all legally purchased under current law – including a military-style assault weapon and 6,000 rounds of ammunition. That’s because existing gun laws are riddled with loopholes and gaps. For example, a 1994 law that banned the sale of military-style assault rifles was allowed to expire in 2004.
There are also numerous steps that the federal government could take to step up gun enforcement. But federal enforcement action on guns has been constantly hampered by the efforts of the gun lobby, which has left the federal agency responsible for enforcing firearms laws – the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) – under-funded and without permanent leadership.
Myth: Guns don’t kill people – people kill people.
Fact: More guns means more gun murders and more gun suicides.
The Harvard Injury Control Research Center has accumulated a considerable body of evidence about the relationship between gun availability and gun violence, concluding that more guns means more gun murders and more gun suicides.
Myth: America’s gun laws don’t work.
Fact: Research demonstrates the effectiveness of a wide range of gun laws, including:
Myth: Gun ownership is on the rise and guns are everywhere.
Fact: Gun ownership in America is in decline.
Actually, gun ownership is significantly in decline in America, according to the General Social Survey, one of the leading sources of data in social science research. A vast majority of the American public do not own firearms, but those Americans who own guns own more of them.
Myth: If someone had a gun at the scene of a mass shooting, tragedy could have been prevented.
Fact: There is no credible evidence that the carrying of hidden, loaded weapons decreases crime.
There is no credible evidence that the carrying of hidden, loaded weapons decreases crime. In fact, the argument that more guns equal less crime has been thoroughly debunked by a range of academic researchers.
Myth: The Second Amendment is a barrier to stronger gun laws
Fact: The Second Amendment and recent Supreme Court decisions do not block stronger gun laws.
The U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Heller v. D.C. and McDonald v. Chicago do not prevent strong gun regulations. Far from it. In Heller v. D.C., Justice Antonin Scalia wrote:
“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited…nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”
Since the Heller decision, lower courts across the nation have found a wide range of firearms law constitutional. Put simply, the Second Amendment and recent Supreme Court decisions are not barriers to stronger gun laws.
New York Times editorial on Newtown tragedy
USA Today story on law enforcement support for stronger gun laws
Associated Press story on vigils held at the White House
Salon story on the research case for gun violence prevention
Philanthropy Must Challenge the Idea That Gun Violence Can’t Be Stopped - Chronicle of Philanthropy
Demand a Plan to Prevent Gun Violence - Mayors Against Illegal Guns
Strengthening Background Checks for Firearm Purchasers - National Law Enforcement Partnership
Polling Data: Public support for requiring background checks for all firearm purchasers - National Law Enforcement Partnership