Poll Gauges Public Attitudes toward Political Violence in the United States

Political violence -- from high profile events like the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol to local extremist threats to election workers, school board members and other citizens -- represents a growing threat to our democracy. In response, The Joyce Foundation, Trusted Elections Fund, and The Klarman Family Foundation initiated a public opinion research project exploring the public’s view of, and reaction to, political violence and extremism.

Conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research between January-April 2022, the project included two national surveys, with state and demographic oversamples of Black, Latinx & Asian Americans, as well as residents in 14 states, including Michigan, Ohio & Wisconsin in the Great Lakes region.

The research project also included social media listening and analysis in hopes of better understanding the public’s view of political violence and armed political extremism; and four focus group sessions including among young people, voters of color, gun owners, and self-described conservative voters.

There were some hopeful findings. Most people are united in the belief that political violence is intolerable: 83 percent of respondents said violence intended to influence a party or election is never or almost never justified. Further, there was strong support – over 70 percent – for a variety of policy solutions aimed at preventing armed extremist or political violence from threatening democracy. Perhaps most exciting is that these high levels of support hold true for large majorities, across political parties and among gun owners.

The research team also hoped to learn if and how threats of political violence impact the public’s likelihood of participating in (or avoiding) civic activity, gauge support for policy reforms, and, finally, provide guidance on effect messaging to discuss potential threats in a way that does not chill people from voting or participating in other civic activities.

The research acknowledged the difficulty in a public opinion survey of approximating the conditions of political violence or the threat of it on civic participation. But it attempted to measure that impact by exposing half the sample to a discussion of political violence before gauging political participation, and then comparing it to a sample of respondents whose political participation was measured before any discussion of political violence. In this test, no evidence emerged suggesting that educating the public on risks of political violence broadly discourages civic participation.

Finally, in an attempt to understand and correct mis- and disinformation on political violence, the research determined that peer-to-peer outreach would be most effective—meaning friends and family make stronger advocates for addressing the issue than any broad messenger. Outside of peers, military and law enforcement were deemed most credible, though these results vary among different racial and partisan groups.

Learn more about the project, its methodology and findings here.

About The Joyce Foundation

Joyce is a nonpartisan, private foundation that invests in evidence-informed public policies and strategies to advance racial equity and economic mobility for the next generation in the Great Lakes region.

Related Content


Reclaiming Reform: Policing, Public Safety & Public Trust

Joyce and Crain's Business Chicago hosted a public forum to discuss national best practices in police reform and assess how they could be applied to Chicago as the City works to implement it’s consent decree and selects a new leader of CPD.


New Responses to Illegal Gun Possession: Prosecutor Led Gun Diversion Program Evaluation Results From Minneapolis, MN and Brooklyn, NY 

During this webinar, researchers from The Marron Institute and the Smart Decarceration Project housed at the University of Chicago present new findings from evaluations of two prosecutor led gun diversion programs


Presenting a New Dashboard on Violent Deaths in Michigan

The new tool visualizes information on violent deaths in the state to help communities better develop prevention strategies and policies.

In The Media

Opinion: For those recently released from prison, a job is more than a second chance

Op-ed by Joyce's Quintin Williams. "April is Second Chance Month in Michigan and nationwide. It signifies the importance of jurisdictions reintegrating people with criminal records into community life."

Crain's Detroit Business


Upcoming Event - Reclaiming Reform: Policing, Public Safety & Public Trust

We invite you to join us for Reclaiming Reform: Policing, Public Safety & Public Trust on May 3, 2023.


New National Polling Data on Different Approaches to Public Safety in America

Lunch & Learn webinar presenting findings of new nationwide public opinion poll of likely voters on their views of various approaches to addressing public safety issues. April 2023


“Not Your Father’s DOJ”: The Emergence of Community Violence Intervention

Louisa Aviles, Gun Violence Prevention & Justice Reform's senior program officer, talks about her longtime experience in Community Violence Intervention (CVI).


Two Great Lakes States Launch Data Dashboards to Report Violent Deaths & Develop Prevention Strategies

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) recently launched MiDVRS and MNDVRS presenting data collected by the NVDRS, the most comprehensive source of data on violent deaths.